RAWALPINDI: In response to a query, he stated that it would be impossible to arrange for Rashid to meet with Imran Khan, the founder of the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), or PTI President Chaudhry Parvez Elahi while he is imprisoned.
He flatly denied claims that Lal Haveli was the hub of all conspiracies or that Rashid encouraged people to assault military sites.
In the meantime, the politician and other defendants in the General Headquarters (GHQ) attack case were granted bail by the ATC. The accused had been the subject of a case filed at the A R Bazaar Police Station.
The former first lady’s absence was criticized by the court during today’s session, which also raised concerns about how she was able to travel without the court’s approval.
In response, her attorney Usman Gill stated that his client’s poor health was the reason she had gone to the hospital.
The prosecution, meanwhile, took issue with Bushra’s medical report, claiming that it omitted any specific therapy the accused had received.
The judge addressed Bushra’s attorney and stated, “You are repeatedly seeking exemption [from appearing before the court] by submitting medical reports,” adding that the person requesting the exemption is not in the room.
The PTI leader was also brought to the podium, where the former prime minister claimed not to comprehend the legalese and that he would sign the charge sheet only after receiving a briefing from his attorney.
He did, however, sign the charge sheet after speaking with his attorneys.
The action takes place one day after the Islamabad High Court (IHC) postponed making a decision on Bushra’s appeal for Maneka’s case to be dismissed.
Through her attorney, Barrister Salman Akram Raja, Bushra argued in her appeal that Maneka’s petition was admissible and that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to hear it. She also asked the court to declare the order made by the extra sessions judge East on January 11 to be “null and void.”
