Bollywood has created a wide variety of films with a wide range of issues; nonetheless, some of them have depicted tensions between Pakistan and India. Historical events like the Partition and the 1971 war are portrayed in movies like “Gadar: Ek Prem Katha” (2001) and “Border” (1997), frequently highlighting the bravery of Indian characters. Although the goal of these films is to depict dramatic historical occurrences, some contend that they could unintentionally reinforce preconceptions and support a biased viewpoint. Filmmakers should handle these subjects delicately and nuancedly in order to foster a more mutually respectful understanding between the two countries.
With the latest in the well-known Bollywood franchise generating controversy and raising eyebrows, the countdown to the release of “Tiger 3” is intensifying. Although the movie promises intense action, breathtaking scenery, and A-list casting, some critics contend that beyond the glossy surface is a story that reinforces harmful stereotypes and exacerbates the already tense relations between Pakistan and India.
Despite being promoted as pure entertainment, some contend that the movie quietly feeds negative perceptions about Pakistan, portraying the nation as a haven for terrorists and evildoers.
The persistence of clichés portraying Pakistan as a haven for terrorists is one of the main issues brought up by detractors. The film runs the risk of promoting mistrust and reinforcing unfavorable preconceptions by continually casting Pakistani characters as the antagonists. It becomes imperative to take into account the influence that these tales may have on public views at a time when international relations are delicate.
The movie ignores Pakistan’s rich cultural, historical, and sociological elements that may have added to a more complete story by only showing Pakistan as a threat. In addition to potentially harming international ties, this simplicity also reduces the possibility of a more meaningful cinematic experience.
Furthermore, Salman Khan, like all actors, has a big say in how the audience perceives him, and his choices about movie parts have an effect on his followers, particularly those in Pakistan.
In Pakistan, Salman Khan has a sizable fan base. A segment of his fan base may get alienated if he appears in a movie that perpetuates stereotypes or presents Pakistan badly, which might result in a drop in support and popularity.
In the globalized world of today, consumers value cultural sensitivity in narrative. Salman Khan’s reputation as a culturally conscious and responsible artist could be harmed by taking part in a project that could be interpreted as encouraging animosity towards a specific nation.
Salman Khan, like every other Bollywood actor, has a social obligation to consider the potential effects of his decisions on public opinion because he is a public figure. By steering clear of ventures that could reinforce harmful preconceptions, he can maintain his feeling of social responsibility and add to a more positive global narrative.
Considering the past hostilities between India and Pakistan, celebrities have the ability to foster harmony and goodwill. Selecting roles that promote collaboration and understanding across cultural boundaries can help to establish goodwill and bridges between the two countries.
Filmmakers, according to critics, ought to handle delicate subjects with tact and consideration, particularly when addressing geopolitical concerns. Never undervalue the influence that the media has on public opinion. Storytelling decisions have the power to either foster empathy and understanding or perpetuate negative stereotypes.
Such kind of movies is just like a sugar coated poison which put reality far behind with their attractive action, plot, and glamour. As far as Pakistan film industry concern it’s a sad reality that there is no projects to tackle these kind of false narrative dramas. Infact our youth falls pray to what they see on screen and also believe what they saw as a reality.
The promise of an exhilarating cinematic experience may be fulfilled by “Tiger 3” or any other bollywood film, but it’s important to consider the influence that the underlying narrative may have. Concerns over the propagation of unfavourable stereotypes and the wider diplomatic ramifications are raised by the movie’s depiction of Pakistan as a dangerous place. As crowds of people swarm theatres, it serves as a reminder that entertainment—even in its most exhilarating form—should be aware of the role it plays in influencing attitudes and forming views on a global basis.
